Canon Film Camera Battery Tests
This web page compares metering information for various Canon cameras tested
over 2 days. The purpose of these tests is two-fold.
- The first reason is
to see what affect battery voltage has on the meter's response and how linear
that response is. This test was applied to Canon F-series cameras that use mercury
cells which are no longer available domestically. Replacement cells of the same
size usually have a higher voltage due to their composition or have some means
of reducing the voltage to a more appropriate value.
- The results from
the first round showed serious variations in metering values. A second round of
test we performed; this time it included newer A-series and T-series Canon cameras.
The purpose here is to see if metering variations continue to appear in newer
models.
The data presented below was obtained
over 2 different days.
Some of the tests were done indoors and are reproduceable. Others were done outdoors
and thus are at the mercy of sunlight conditions.
Batteries and Test Group
2-March-2008
The mercury cell was
chosen for use on older cameras because of its relatively flat voltage curve over
time. As the battery drained, it maintained a fairly constant 1.35v. This made
it ideal for camera use. The seven F-series cameras tested here do no have internal
voltage regulators; they rely on the constant voltage source for accuracy. A replacement
non-mercury battery needs to provide a similarly flat discharge curve to be useful
(both in terms of voltage and over time).
For each camera, three (3) different
batteries are used:
- a 675 zinc-air hearing
aid battery with a rubber O-ring to keep the battery centered in the
camera housing. This battery has a
voltage similar to the mercury cell but has a relatively short life span. Covering
the air holes with tape when not in use can extend battery life significantly.
The voltage from this battery tends to fluctuate a little so readings were taken
at each test cycle.
- a Varta
V625 U alkaline battery. The voltage for this
battery remained constant during the tests.
- a PX625A alkaline battery
(no-name). The voltage for this battery remained constant during the tests.
Alkaline
batteries are known to have voltage decay which makes them unsuitable as constant
voltage sources over time. However the tests I performed were very short metering
tests which did not have any affect on the voltage of the battery. Each battery
was measure before and after each test to make sure it had not decayed. I also
spot checked the current draw on the FT-QL model and found that its current draw
was between 0.01mA (low light) and 0.155 mA (bright light). Circuit resistance
was measured on various camera bodies to double check these readings.
- bright
light - typically 13-25Kohms (0.115 mA to 0.06 mA)
- no light - typically
130K-200Kohms (0.012 mA to to 0.0075 mA)
At these current levels,
I think the test battery, regardless of its composition, will not sag enough under
camera load to affect the metering results.
Cameras in Group1are TX, TLb,
FT, TL, F-1, FTb, FTb-N. Generally speaking, these cameras have a more limited
EV range than Group2 cameras.
9-March-2008
Canon A and T-series
cameras do not have the same voltage problem as the F-series. These are powered
by a variety of cells - 1.5v AA, 1.5v AAA, 6v PX28 (or equivalent), or 1.5v 357
(or equivalent). Two F-series cameras are also immune to the mercury cell problem
- the New F1 uses a 6v battery and the EF has either internal voltage regulation is
designed to be insensitive to voltage variations. Lastly,
I tested a 20D digital camera. Since the lens on this camera is not as fast
as the FD lens I'm using, meter values are different but the corresponding EV
is still valid. The lens is a zoom lens set to cover the same area as the 50mm
FD lens used in the rest of the tests.
The test data shows the voltage level
of the batteries used in the second round of testing. For the cameras not affected
by the mercury cell issue, these numbers are there purely for completeness and
have no affect on metering performance.
Group2 cameras are New F-1, EF,
A-1, AT-1, AL-1, AV-1, AE1-P, AL-1, T60, T70, T90 and 20D.
Test Methodology
2-March-2008
We got 6 inches of snow
the day before and the sky is now clear, blue and sunny. It's also close to freezing
outside. So for a bright subject, I stayed indoors and shoot a scene from of the
bright snow from a window (test T1 in the table below). I only had about an hour
to do this and I want to avoid light changes over time so everything had to be
done rather quickly. For an average brightness scene. I metered a dark blue rug
in the same lighting (test T2 in the table below). T1 and T2 are thus daylight
tests.
In the evening,
I made a second pass with each battery & camera
combination. This time I aimed the camera at an incandescent lamp from a fixed
location (test T3 in the table below).
8-March-2008
Unlike
the first test, the second test was conducted after a full day of rain. No more
snow! Once again, the sky was clear blue but with puffs of clouds blowing by in
relatively stiff winds. Testing took more time as I had to make sure each test
took place when the sun was affected by cloud cover. The results (test T4 in the
table below) are applied only to Group2 cameras.
Another set of intermediate
light level tests similar to test T2 was performed on Group2 cameras (test T5
in the table below). While similar in setup, T5 had less light than T2 due to
weather conditions. Group2 cameras were also tested under conditions identical
to T3. Finally, all cameras in Group1 and Group2 were given a low light test.
Due to the different levels of meter sensitivity, Group2 was tested at EV1 (test
T6) and Group1 was tested at EV3 (test T7).
Disclaimer
None
of this scientific or rigorous so please don't complain about the lack of calibration,
laboratory conditions, etc. The results apply only my test samples and your might
well behave entirely differently. Nonetheles, these results are enough for me
to get a feel for each camera's meter's characteristics.
Reference
For
voltage measurements I used a Fluke 76. My initial reference was a Canon A-1.
I just had a role of film processed from this camera yesterday and everything
looked good. It had a CLA by Ken Oikawa in November '07. With Group2 testing,
I added a Canon 20D digital cameras into the mix. The lens used is a 50mm f/1.4
FD BL chrome nose, no filter, f/1.4 to 16 (not used on the 20D for obvious reaons).
All metering was done with the camera set to ASA100/DIN21. Every reading was taken
with correct focus set and plenty of time was given for the meter to settle.
Though
obvious, it's worth saying - Group1 cameras are old and their metering systems
are not exactly factory fresh. Some of the exposures vary quite a bit from the
reference A-1's meter. The F-1 is the original 1971 flavor. I tried to keep one
parameter (usually the aperture) constant across each line (shutter speed or aperture)
to make it easy to compare, but sometimes, that didn't work out. That's why I
computed EV values. Some cameras were limited by a top shutter speed of only 1/500
instead of 1/1000 (TL, TLb an TX) which didn't help in keeping a constant aperture
across the table.
Keep
in mind that the term "reference" applied
to the A-1 just meas it is used for comparison against other readings. It does
not mean that the readings from the A-1 are "correct" or held to a higher
standard than other readings.
Also note
that the AE-1 and EF also had a
CLA by Mr. Oikawa at the same time as the A-1.
Nomenclature
- If a
meter reading is close to "exact" meaning the needles match
fairly well, (or the needle is real close to the "dot"), then that's
the value shown in the table.
- If a correct exposure seems to be more-or-less
in-between two readings, I will write insert the 1/2 stop value even if it's not
a setting on the camera. For example, if the exposure is between f/11 and f/16,
I will write f/13 even though it is not a setting on most cameras. The same applies
to shutter speeds. Cameras like the A-1 and T90 display 1/2 stop settings but
most don't.
- If a
correct exposure is just a little off a particular speed,
I will add "-" or "+". In other words "125 +" means
a little over 125 (towards 250) while "125 -" means a little less than
125 (towards 60). The base number is used to compute the corresponding EV.
- "over"
means overexposure - the camera can not meter the scene.
- "under"
means underexposure - the camera can not meter the scene.
- "unreliable"
means the meter did not respond smoothly to changes in light level well enough
to give an adequate sense of decent sensitivity to this light level.
Test Results
Tests Groups - Summary
Test |
Groups |
Condition |
A-1 meter reading (EV -2-18) |
EV (A-1 reference) |
T1 |
1 |
outdoor snow scene, daylight |
1/350 @ f/11 |
EV 15.5 |
T2 |
1 |
blue rug, daylight |
1/125 @ f/1.4 |
EV 8 |
T3 |
1 & 2 |
incandescent lamp |
1/45 @ f/5.6 |
EV 10.5 |
T4 |
2 |
outdoor white paper, daylight |
1/1000 @ f/11 |
EV 17 |
T5 |
2 |
blue rug, daylight (like T2) |
1/30 @ f/1.8 |
EV 6.5 |
T6 |
2 |
dark felt, indoor lighting |
1 @ f/1.4 |
EV 1 |
T7 |
1 |
dark felt. indoor lighting |
1/4 @ f/1.4 |
EV 3 |
Test Data
There are several
ways to use this data; including:
- Reading
across gives the variation in exposure with changes in voltage (Group1)
- Reading
across in groups of 4 tests per camera gives an idea of the linearity of the meter
with changes in lighting. When compared with the reference A-1 meter, this can
be used to determine whether a linear compensation value can be used to correct
the exposure.
- Reading down the columns,
one can see the differences that slight voltages cause in the metering.
- Comparing results of cameras within
a family and families within the overall sampling.
Exposure differences
are calculated with respect to the Reference A-1 EV value column. A positive (negative)
exposure difference means overexposure (underexposure); all relative to the A-1's
meter.
Each camera is
listed with it's EV range (according to spec) and
sensor type. The line marked "comp" is the amount of compensation to
apply to the camera (via the ASA dial) to make that camera and battery combination
useful. This is explained later in the Conclusion section.
Group 1 Camera |
Test |
No-name PX625 (1.548 V) |
No-name EV |
Exposure difference |
Varta V625U (1.493 V) |
Varta EV |
Exposure difference |
675 hearing aid battery |
675 EV |
Exposure difference |
Reference A-1 EV |
TX |
T1 |
1/500 @ f/16 |
17 |
-1.5 |
1/500 @ f/13 |
16.5 |
-1 |
1/350 @ f/11 (1.418 V) |
15.5 |
0 |
15.5 |
(3.7-17) |
T3 |
1/125 @ f/5.6 |
12 |
-1.5 |
1/90 @ f/5.6 |
11.5 |
-1 |
1/45 @ f/5.6 (1.402 V) |
10.5 |
0 |
10.5 |
CdS |
T2 |
1/125 @ f/1.4 |
8 |
0 |
1/125 @ f/1.4 |
8 |
0 |
1/60 @ f/1.4 (1.418 V) |
7 |
+1 |
8 |
|
T7 |
1/2 @ f/1.4 |
2 |
+1 |
1/2 @ f/1.4 |
2 |
+1 |
1/2 @ f/1.4 (1.398 V) |
2 |
+1 |
3 |
comp |
|
|
|
DNU |
|
|
0 |
|
|
+0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TLb |
T1 |
over |
--- |
--- |
over |
--- |
--- |
1/500 @ f/13 (1.390 V) |
16.5 |
-1 |
15.5 |
(3.7-17) |
T3 |
1/125 @ f/5.6 |
12 |
-1.5 |
1/125 - @ f/5.6 |
12 |
-1.5 |
1/60 @ f/5.6 (1.402 V) |
11 |
-0.5 |
10.5 |
CdS |
T2 |
1/350 @ f/1.4 |
9.5 |
-1.5 |
1/250 @ f/1.8 |
9.5 |
-1.5 |
1/250 @ f/1.4 (1.390 V) |
9 |
-1 |
8 |
|
T7 |
1/4 @ f/2 |
4 |
-1 |
1/4 @ f/2 |
4 |
-1 |
1/4 @ f/2 (1.398 V) |
4 |
-1 |
3 |
comp |
|
|
|
-1.5 |
|
|
-1.5 |
|
|
-1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FT |
T1 |
1/500 @ f/11 |
16 |
-0.5 |
1/350 @ f/11 |
15.5 |
0 |
1/250 @ f/11 (1.389 V) |
15 |
+0.5 |
15.5 |
(3-18) |
T3 |
1/45 @ f/5.6 |
10.5 |
0 |
1/60 @ f/5.6 |
11 |
-0.5 |
1/30 @ f/5.6 (1.405 V) |
10 |
+0.5 |
10.5 |
CdS |
T2 |
1/90 @ f/1.4 |
7.5 |
+0.5 |
1/90 @ f/1.4 |
7.5 |
+0.5 |
1/60 @ f/1.4 (1.389 V) |
7 |
+1 |
8 |
|
T7 |
unreliable |
--- |
--- |
unreliable |
--- |
--- |
unreliable |
--- |
--- |
3 |
comp |
|
|
|
DNU |
|
|
DNU |
|
|
DNU |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TL |
T1 |
over |
--- |
--- |
1/500 @ f/16 |
17 |
-1.5 |
1/500 @ f/16 (1.369 V) |
17 |
-1.5 |
15.5 |
(3.5-17) |
T3 |
1/60 + @ f/5.6 |
11 |
-0.5 |
1/60 + @ f/5.6 |
11 |
-0.5 |
1/60 @ f/5.6 (1.405 V) |
11 |
-0.5 |
10.5 |
CdS |
T2 |
1/125 @ f/1.4 |
8 |
0 |
1/125 @ f/1.4 |
8 |
0 |
1/125 @ f/1.4 (1.369 V) |
8 |
0 |
8 |
|
T7 |
1/8 @ f/1.4 |
4 |
-1 |
1/8 @ f/1.4 |
4 |
-1 |
1/8 @ f/1.4 (1.397 V) |
4 |
-1 |
3 |
comp |
|
|
|
-0.5 |
|
|
-1 |
|
|
-1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-1 |
T1 |
1/1000 @ f/11 |
17 |
-1.5 |
1/750 @ f/11 |
16.5 |
-1 |
1/250 + @ f/11 (1.377 V) |
15 |
+0.5 |
15.5 |
(2.5-18) |
T3 |
1/125 + @ f/5.6 |
12 |
-1.5 |
1/125 + @ f/5.6 |
12 |
-1.5 |
1/125 @ f/5.6 (1.405 V) |
12 |
-1.5 |
10.5 |
|
T2 |
1/180 @ f/1.4 |
8.5 |
-0.5 |
1/125 @ f/1.4 |
8 |
0 |
1/125 @ f/1.4 (1.377 V) |
8 |
0 |
8 |
|
T7 |
1/4 @ f/1.8 |
3.5 |
-0.5 |
1/4 @ f/1.8 |
3.5 |
-0.5 |
1/4 @ f/1.4 (1.400 V) |
3 |
0 |
3 |
comp |
|
|
|
-1 |
|
|
-1 |
|
|
-0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FTb |
T1 |
1/1000 @ f/16 |
18 |
-2.5 |
1/1000 @ f/16 |
18 |
-2.5 |
1/500 @ f/16 (1.378 V) |
17 |
-1.5 |
15.5 |
(2.5-18) |
T3 |
1/250 @ f/5.6 |
13 |
-2.5 |
1/180 @ f/5.6 |
12.5 |
-2 |
1/125 @ f/5.6 (1.408 V) |
12 |
-1.5 |
10.5 |
CdS |
T2 |
1/500 @ f1.4 |
10 |
-2 |
1/250 @ f/1.4 |
9 |
-1 |
1/250 @ f/1.4 (1.378 V) |
9 |
-1 |
8 |
|
T7 |
1/8 @ f/1.8 |
4.5 |
-1.5 |
1/8 @ f/1.8 |
4.5 |
-1.5 |
1/8 @ f/1.8 (1.397 V) |
4.5 |
-1.5 |
3 |
comp |
|
|
|
-2 |
|
|
-1.5 |
|
|
-1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FTb-N |
T1 |
over |
--- |
--- |
1/1000 @ f/16 |
18 |
-2.5 |
1/250 @ f/16 (1.378 V) |
16 |
-0.5 |
15.5 |
(2.5-18) |
T3 |
1/125 + @ f/5.6 |
12 |
-1.5 |
1/125 @ f/5.6 |
12 |
-1.5 |
1/90 @ f/5.6 (1.411 V) |
11.5 |
-1 |
10.5 |
CdS |
T2 |
1/250 @ f/1.4 |
9 |
-1 |
1/250 @ f/1.4 |
9 |
-1 |
1/125 @ f/1.4 (1.378 V) |
8 |
0 |
8 |
|
T7 |
1 @ f/1.4 |
1 |
+2 |
1 @ f/1.4 |
1 |
+2 |
1 @ f/1.4 (1.398 V) |
1 |
+2 |
3 |
comp |
|
|
|
DNU |
|
|
DNU |
|
|
DNU |
|
Group2 cameras
are not tested for voltage variations. For completeness,
here's the battery information:
- 6V Radion
Shack Lithium 23-266 2CR 1/3N. (PX28 equivalent). 5.92v
- 1.5v Energizer 357 (AS76,
MS76 equivalent) 1.591v
- 1.5v
Lextron AA alkaline. 1.604v
- 1.5v Duravell AAA alkaline. 1.583v
A
positive (negative) exposure difference means overexposure (underexposure); all
relative to the A-1's meter.
Group 2 Camera |
Test |
Meter reading |
EV |
Reference A-1 EV |
Exposure difference |
New F-1 |
T4 |
1/1000 @ f/13 |
17.5 |
17 |
-0.5 |
(-1-20) |
T3 |
1/60 @ f/5.6 |
11 |
10.5 |
-0.5 |
SPC |
T5 |
1/30 @ f/2.5 |
7.5 |
6.5 |
-1.0 |
|
T6 |
1 @ f/2 |
2 |
1 |
-1.0 |
comp |
|
| |
|
-0.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
T60 |
T4 |
1/1000 @ f/11 |
17 |
17 |
0 |
(2-18) |
T3 |
1/30 @ f/5.6 |
10 |
10.5 |
+0.5 |
SPC |
T5 |
1/30 @ f/1.8 |
6.5 |
6.5 |
0 |
|
T6 |
1/4 @ f/1.4 |
3 |
1 |
-2.0 |
comp |
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
T70 |
T4 |
1/1000 @ f/9.5 |
16.5 |
17 |
+0.5 |
(1-19) |
T3 |
1/30 @ f/5.6 |
10 |
10.5 |
+0.5 |
SPC |
T5 |
1/30 @ f/1.8 |
6.5 |
6.5 |
0 |
|
T6 |
1 @ f/1.8 |
1.5 |
1 |
-0.5 |
comp |
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
T90 |
T4 |
1/1000 @ f/11 |
17 |
17 |
0 |
(0-20) |
T3 |
1/45 @ f/5.6 |
10.5 |
10.5 |
0 |
SPC |
T5 |
1/30 @ f/1.8 |
6.5 |
6.5 |
0 |
|
T6 |
1 @ f/1.4 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
comp |
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
AT-1 |
T4 |
1/1000 @ f/9.5 |
16.5 |
17 |
+0.5 |
(3-17) |
T3 |
1/30 @ f/5.6 |
10 |
10.5 |
+0.5 |
CdS |
T5 |
1/30 @ f/2.5 |
7.5 |
6.5 |
-1.0 |
|
T6 |
1 @ f/4 |
4 |
1 |
-3.0 |
comp |
|
|
|
|
DNU |
|
|
|
|
|
|
AE-1 |
T4 |
1/1000 @ f/8 |
16 |
17 |
+1.0 |
(1-18) |
T3 |
1/30 @ f/6.7 |
10.5 |
10.5 |
0 |
SPC |
T5 |
1/30 @ f/1.8 |
6.5 |
6.5 |
0 |
|
T6 |
1 @ f/1.8 |
1.5 |
1 |
-0.5 |
comp |
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
AV-1 |
T4 |
1/750 @ f/11 |
16.5 |
17 |
+0.5 |
(1-18) |
T3 |
1/30 @ f/5.6 |
10 |
10.5 |
+0.5 |
SPC |
T5 |
1/45 @ f/1.8 |
7 |
6.5 |
-0.5 |
|
T6 |
1 @ f/1.8 |
1.5 |
1 |
-0.5 |
comp |
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
AE-1P |
T4 |
1/1000 @ f/8 |
16 |
17 |
+1 |
(1-18) |
T3 |
1/30 @ f/4 |
9 |
10.5 |
+1.5 |
SPC |
T5 |
1/30 @ f/1.4 |
6 |
6.5 |
+0.5 |
|
T6 |
under |
--- |
1 |
--- |
comp |
|
|
|
|
DNU (see later test) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
AL-1 |
T4 |
1/1000 @ f/11 |
17 |
17 |
0 |
(1-18) |
T3 |
1/30 @ f/5.6 |
10 |
10.5 |
+0.5 |
SPC |
T5 |
1/30 @ f/1.8 |
6.5 |
6.5 |
0 |
|
T6 |
1 @ f/1.8 |
1.5 |
1 |
-0.5 |
comp |
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
EF |
T4 |
1/1000 @ f/11 |
17 |
17 |
0 |
(-2-18) |
T3 |
1/30 @ f/5.6 |
10 |
10.5 |
+0.5 |
SPC |
T5 |
1/30 @ f/2 |
7 |
6.5 |
-0.5 |
|
T6 |
1 @ f/1.4 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
comp |
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20D |
T4 |
1/1000 @ f/8 |
16 |
17 |
+1 |
(1-20) |
T3 |
1/40 @ f/5.6 |
<10.5 |
10.5 |
+ > 0 |
SPC |
T5 |
1/13 @ f/3.5 |
<7.5 |
6.5 |
- < 1 |
|
T6 |
4 @ f/3.5 |
1.5 |
1 |
-0.5 |
comp |
|
|
|
|
0 |
This
began as an exercise in determining how a change in meter supply voltage to an
F-series Canon camera would affect the meter's linearity. The prevailing belief
is that the increased voltage not only changes the exposure but is also non-linear
thus the difference can not be compensated with a linear exposure adjustment (such
as with the ASA dial). After I looked over the Group1 data, it became clear to
me that the numbers were all over the map. Even the zinc-air hearing aid battery
which is supposed to be very much like the old mercury battery both in voltage
and decay curve showed a wide variation in meter reading when compared to the
A-1. This led me to perform Group2 tests to see if the A-1 readings were consistent
enough to be considered accurate.
The Group2 data shows decent corrolation
(+/- 0.5 EV) between the A-1, EF, AL-1, AV-1, T-70 and T-90. In fact, the T-90
was identical to the A-1. The remaining cameras in this group fell within +/- 1
EV. The obvious exception is the AT-1, which is unlike the other A-series cameras
in its use of a CdS sensor. Overall, I feel pretty good in treating the A-1 as
a reasonable reference meter. Therefore, for these cameras, I conclude
the following:
- The A-1 seems to be
a decent meter reference. Thus...
- On
the F-series cameras, a voltage closer to that of the original 1.35v mercury cell
is prefered because...
- A good number of
these older cameras are likely to underexpose if a higher voltage
is supplied to the meter. The 675 hearing aid
battery is a decent replacement. However...
- Because the meters are relatively
inaccurate (relative to the A-1), and also non-linear regardless of the
supplied voltage, there is no reason why a higher voltage battery can not be used
with the exposure compensated via the ASA dial (see below).
- As a group,
the cameras in Group1 represent aging technology, that while usable, may have
seen their best days pass them by. While I love old cameras, these simple test
exposed some of the annoyances of older designs. For example, the battery cover
on these cameras is simply the worse design possible. Visibility in the
viewfinder can be very poor - in low light testing, it's
sometimes impossible to see the meter's reading in the viewfinder. And the slow
response time of the CdS cell is blatantly obvious. By contrast, the A-1, T70
and T90 were a joy to use with all the information clearly visible in the viewfinder.
The T90's batteries last a very long time but of course, that's no replacement
for a fully mechanical shutter. The EF is very nice, with full information in
the viewfinder; but does suffer from legibility in low light.
- On the
whole the CdS meters used in the F-series (and the AT-1) have much greater variability
than the Silicon Photocells (SPC). When they deviate, the camera with SPC sensors
tend to overexpose at the higher EV levels and underexpose at lower EV levels
(relative to the A-1 reference). The CdS cameras do not exhibit consistant patterns
from model to model.
- If
I were to use any one of the bodies in Group1,
I would compensate it individually since the group behavior is all over
the map.
- For
those faithfully loyal to their F-series bodies, I suggest performing a series
of tests like the ones I've done. You never know what you'll come out with.
Using
the above test data, I can draw some conclusions on the amount of compensation
that could be applied to each of the cameras listed above to yield reasonable
results. The goal is to provide a +/- 0.5 EV accuracy (relative to the A-1 reference).
Sometimes, this is not possible and the amount of compensation is biased to provide
the best possible outcome given the test data. Other times, the meter is so inaccurate
it's just not worth using. The line marked "comp" in each test camera's
data set gives data as follows:
- "0" means no adjustment necessary.
- "+",
or "-" EV adjustment. A positive (negative) value means the ASA dial
needs to be adjusted to a higher (lower) than the actual film used. For example,
for ASA100 film, a "+1" means the ASA dial should be set one stop higher
(ASA200) while a "-1" means the ASA dial should be set 1 stop lower
(ASA50). Remember that the numbers in the table are defined such that a positive
error means overexposure, the camera has to be told the film is faster than it
really is in order to reduce the amount of light exposed on the film. Compensation
can also be done via the exposure compensation dial if available. I prefer the
ASA dial.
- DNU - Do Not Use.
Sometimes, no amount of adjustment is useful.
The meter is simply not accurate enough. This is largely a matter of personal
taste. YMMV.
Caveats
There are only 4 sample
points per
camera and the lighting conditions are far from well controlled. Does that matter?
I've used some of these cameras with a simple tweak of the ASA dial based on a
simple sample point (test T3) and the results have been fine. But like all things
subjective, I'm sure there are those who would disagree with my results. Yes,
I could get all of these bodies CLA'ed but that would be cost prohibitive and
I don't see how they would be any more accurate then simply tweaking the exposure.
To each his own.
Additional Test With Canon EF
The
Canon EF camera is a little unusual in several ways. In terms of batteries and
metering, the EF uses Silicon Photocells (1973) even as other cameras released
later such as the Canon F-1n (1976) continued to use older CdS sensors. The EF
uses the same 1.35v mercury cells used in the F-series but differs in two ways
- it has 2 such batteries and is reputed to be immune to voltage variations
imposed by the new 625 batteries.
The schematic for
the EF's circuitry does not reveal if the design has internal voltage
regulation (possibily in
IC2) or if it simply is voltage insensitive. I decided to run a quick
test to prove or disprove the general claim. The table below shows
that set sets of batteries at different voltages gave identical metering results. So the good news
is that modern 625 battery that delivers ~1.5v can be used in place of the old
1.35v mercury cells with no changes on the metering results.
|
2 x 625 (1.489v, 1.533v) |
2 x 675 (hearing aid) (1.353v, 1.384v) |
Difference |
Test A |
1/500 @ f/11 (EV16) |
1/500 @ f/11 (EV16) |
0 |
Test B |
1/125 @ f/2 (EV9) |
1/125 @ f/2 (EV9) |
0 |
Test C |
1/30 @ f/5.6 (EV10) |
1/30 @ f/5.6 (EV10) |
0 |
Test D |
1/2 @ f/1.4 (EV2) |
1/2 @ f/1.4 (EV2) |
0 |
Additional Test With Canon F1(n)
The Canon F1(n) was released in
1976 and was an upgraded version of the F1. Its metering range according to the
Canon Museum web site
is EV2.5 to EV18. In terms of metering and its battery, it uses the same
1.3v mercury cell used in the original F1.
The table below compares a
Lake Placid edition F1(n)
with my A-1 reference at three test points. The meter in this sample shows
non-linearities compared to the A-1's meter
at both ends of its range. With an increased voltage of 1.5v, the higher
EV values moved up more and actually helped
to level out the overall response curve.
|
A1 6v PX28 |
F1(n)
Varta V625U
(1.491v) |
Exposure Difference |
F1(n)
675 (hearing aid)
(1.358v) |
Exposure Difference |
Test A |
1/1000 @ f/6.7
(EV15.5) |
1/1000 @
f/11
(EV17) |
-1.5 EV |
1/1000 @
f/8
(EV16) |
-0.5 EV |
Test B |
1/30 @
f/6.7
(EV10.5) |
1/30 @
f/11
(EV12) |
-1.5 EV |
1/30 @
f/6.7
(EV10.5) |
0 EV |
Test C |
1 sec @
f/1.4
(EV1) |
1 sec @
f/2
(EV2) |
-1 EV |
1 @
f/2
(EV2) |
-1 EV |
Comp |
|
|
-1.25 EV |
|
0 EV |
Looking at the number in
the original Group 2 tests, the results of the Canon AE-1 Program (AE-1P) seem out of place.
From a hardware point of view, the AE-1P should perform nearly identically to
its sibblings A-series camera with the exception
of the AT-1 which uses a CdS cell instead of a newer Silicon PhotoCell (SPC).
The particular AE-1P I used was one I bought on eBay and I
suspected it wasn't the at its prime.
I recently acquired another AE-1P,
and after a little work to get rid of the infamous Canon Squeal, I ran some
tests against my reference A-1. Lo and behold, the metering was almost identical.
So I feel comfortable saying that
my first sample was not representative of a properly functioning AE-1P and that
the AE-1P is capable of identical
performance as the other SPC based A-series Canon cameras.
I acquired a black FTb recently
and decided to run the same simple metering tests on this unit as I had with the
other F-series cameras. The table below shows the raw data. As before, I used
my A-1 as my meter reference.
Additionally, I also ran
the same test with my previously tested silver FTb. This would show if
my previous test results are still valid for that camera and give some
indication of potential changes and/or variability of test results over time.
|
A1
(6v PX28) |
Black FTb (1.348v) |
Exposure
Difference |
Black FTb
(1.502v) |
Exposure
Difference |
Silver FTb (1.346) |
Exposure
Difference |
Silver FTb
(1.502v) |
Exposure
Difference |
Test A |
1/1000 @
f/13
(EV17.5) |
1/1000 @
f/6.3 (EV15.5) |
+2.0 EV |
1/1000 @
f/8
(EV 16) |
+1.5 EV |
1/1000 @
f/11 (EV17) |
+0.5 EV |
1/1000 @
f/19
(EV 18.5) |
-1.0 EV |
Test B |
1/1000 @
f/4
(EV14) |
1/1000 @
f/4
EV14) |
0.0 EV |
1/1000 @
f/5.6
EV15) |
-1.0 EV |
1/1000 @
f/5.6
(EV15) |
-1.0 EV |
1/1000 @
f/9.5
EV 16.5) |
-2.5 EV |
Test C |
1/30 @
f5.6
(EV 10)
|
1/30 @
f/4
(EV9) |
+1.0 EV |
1/30 @
f/4.5
(EV 9.5) |
+0.5 EV |
1/30 @
f/5.6
(EV 10) |
0.0 EV |
1/30 @
f/6.3
(EV 10.5) |
-0.5 EV |
Test D |
1/4 @
f/1.4
(EV3) |
1/4 @
f/1.4
(EV3) |
0.0 EV |
1/4 @
f/1.4
(EV3) |
0.0 EV |
1/4 @
f/2.0
(EV4) |
-1.0 EV |
1/4 @
f/2.0
(EV4) |
-1.0 EV |
Comp |
|
|
+0.5 EV |
|
0.0 |
|
-0.5 EV |
|
-1.5 EV |
The black FTb was off
at the high EV end but ok otherwise with a 1.3v battery. At 1.5v
the numbers are skewed about +0.5 EV relative to the 1.3v numbers.
The results of the old silver FTb are more interesting. Comparing
these results with the previous ones, the new numbers show more
variability than the old ones at either voltage levels. The
non-linear nature of the response curve remains.
|