|  
			
	
	   
	
       
		3-Way High Efficiency Speaker 
		 
        (Lavoce, Dynaudio, Foster 3-way. October-2023) 
       
		LCR MTM 3-Channel Speaker 
		 
        (Three MTM Speakers in One. July-2023) 
       
		Mini7bt - A Minimus 7 Portable Bluetooth Speaker 
		 
        (Minimus 7 and Dayton Audio. Spring-2022) 
       
		2-Way Ribbon Tweeter Speakers 
		 
        (Vifa and Pioneer. May-2020) 
       
		Transmission Line Speakers 
		 
        (Aborted attempt at a TL. September-2012) 
       
		Acoustic Research AR-4x Rehab 
		 
        (Rehab of a garage sale find. January-2016) 
       
		Infinity RS-4000 Rehab 
		 
        (Rehab of a garage sale find. June-2015) 
       
		Polaris 
		 
    (A tall, thin, upwards firing omnidirectional speaker. May-2010) 
	   
		Shiva_PR15 
		 
	  (A powered subwoofer using a 12" driver and 15" passive radiator. Jan-2010) 
	   
		Can-Less 
		 
		(A computer speaker; redux. December-2005)  
	   
		Can-Can 
		 
		(A computer speaker in a light canister. Jan-2005) 
	   
		Sonosub 
		 
		(10" vented subwoofer in a cardboard tube, powered by a Parapix amp. May-1999) 
	   
		MTM Center Channel Speaker  
		(A Madisound design. Nov-1997) 			  
	   
		2-way Surround Speakers  
		(5" woofer and 1" tweeter. July 1997)  			  
	   
		3-piece mini system  
		(6" DVC bass module mated to 4" car speaker. June 1997) 			  
	   
		3-way Vented Floorstanding Speaker  
		(vented 10" woofer, 5" mid and 1" tweeter in a 4 
		ft tower. Summer 1995) 
	   
		NHT1259 Subwoofer  
		(A 12" woofer in a sealed architectural pedestal. Winter 1994-95) 
	   
		Inexpensive Speaker Stands  
		(Particle board, sand and spray paint. Fall 1994) 			  
	   
		2-way satellite  
		(6.5" woofer and 1" tweeter. Summer/Fall 1994)  			
	
	
	 
		
		| Audio Electronics Related Projects | 
	 
	 
	
	
	  
	 
	  
		900 MHz Audio Receiver  
  (Better use for bad headphones. Jan-2008) 	
	  
		Buster - A Simple Guitar Amp  
  		(Perfect for the beginner. Jan-2010) 	
	  
		A PC-based Audio Console  
	  (Use a PC to play tunes. Jan-2010) 			
	   
		LM-12 Amp  
		(Bridged LM-12 opamps. Aug-2003) 
	  
		 CeeDeePee  
		(A CD player and FM tuner from spare computer parts. Oct-2002) 
	  
		 Quad 2000 4-Channel Amp  
		(Premade modules by Marantz. May-1998) 			  
	  
		 Zen Amp and Bride of Zen Preamp  
		(by Nelson Pass. Apr-1997) 	
	
	
	  
	
	  
	 		
	   
		Using Wood in Speakers FAQ  
		(Work in progress) 
	  
		 MDF FAQ for speaker builders 
  
	   
		
		Woodworking Tools for the DYIer   (HomeTheaterHiFi.com Oct-1998) 			
	   
		Some Thoughts on Cabinet Finished for DIY Speakers
  
	  
		 Large Grills Made Easy 
  
	  
		 Some Parts Suppliers   (Outdated) 			  			  
		
	
	  
	
	  
	 
	   
		DIY Audio Related URLs 			
	   
		Veneering Primer  	(by Keith Lahteine) 
	  
		 How to get a Black Piano Finish  
		(by DYI Loudspeaker List members) 
	   
		Sonotube FAQ  (by Gordon McGill) 
	   
		Excerpts from the Bass List 	(Oldies but Goodies) 
		
	
	  
	 
	   
	DIY Loudspeaker List Archives  
 | 
		
		 
			
				 
					|  
						 3-way 
							Vented Floorstanding Speaker - Results 
							
						The results 
							compare very favorably with the initial goals. More importantly, 
							I'm very happy with the sound of these speakers, though I'm 
							naturally biased :) The bass is tight, deep and not boomy. 
							Telarc's 1812 cannons are impressive. High volume are just 
							as nice. The ScanSpeak tweeter is sweet but not overly bright. 
							I could listen to these speakers all day without fatigue. 
							 
						These speakers 
							are currently powered by a 100 wpc Pioneer integrated amp. 
							The room measures roughly 25 by 12 feet and has a sloping 
							cathedral ceilings up to about 15 ft. Logistical reasons have 
							forced me to place the speakers about 6 feet apart, and some 
							20 feet from the listening couch which is against one wall. 
							One speaker is near a wall while the other is almost centered 
							between the 12 ft span and some 4 ft from the rear wall. From 
							the couch, imaging in this setup is mediocre at best. This 
							is not surprising given the relative distances involved. Increasing 
							the seperation of the speakers to at least 9 feet by moving 
							the speaker from its central location towards the other wall 
							significantly improves imaging, despite the 20 ft couch distance. 
							This is the setup I use when doing real listening (which is 
							when the kids are tucked into bed and the speaker can be safely 
							relocated).  
							Final external 
							dimensions are 16.25 inches deep (16.75 at base), 11.75 inches 
							wide (13.375 at base) and 50.5 inches tall. Approximate internal 
							volume is 2.9 cu. ft. for the woofer and 0.25 cu. ft. for 
							the midrange. Finished weight is over 75 pounds per speaker. 
							 
						Cost (in 
							USD) works out to - $52 ( AC-10 
							, on sale), $38.50 ( 5N313 
							, on sale), $53.75 ( D2905/9000 
							), $30 (wood, MDF, hardware, etc.) and $100 (crossover) or 
							$274.25 per speaker. Crossover design was $35 from 
							Madisound. 
							 
						After breaking 
							in the speakers with a few days of listening, I tried to measure 
							the frequency response with a Radio 
							Shack handheld SPL meter (cat. 33-2050) and Stereophile's 
							Test 2 and 3 CDs. The SPL meter is rated at 32Hz to 10 KHz 
							+-3 dB and yielded a measured response of 89.5 +- 5 dB from 
							32Hz to 10KHz. Measurements were made in-room at 1 meter and 
							2.83 V (1KHz) and thus suffered from room interaction. Measurements 
							taken below 32 Hz and above 10 KHz dropped immediately, showing 
							the limited range of the meter. There was 5 dB dip in the 
							125 to 250 Hz range probably due to room suckout. Placing 
							the speaker adjacent the wall exhibited a reinforced low end, 
							yielding a +5 dB bump in the 50 to 100 Hz range and removed 
							the 125 to 250 Hz dip mentioned above. There was also a +5 
							dB peak centered at 6300 Hz. My wife and I then did some listening 
							and could not hear this peak from the test CD. We concluded 
							that this was most likely due to the inaccuracy of the SPL 
							meter Unfortunately, I did not have the chance to measure 
							these outdoors to compare them to the LEAP predicted response 
							- maybe some day.  
							In summary, 
							I'm extremely pleased with the entire project. The sound of 
							these speakers rivals those of commercial speakers costing 
							a while lot more. The results are extremely satisfying, and 
							the accessible crossover means that future crossover tweaking 
							is still possible (though not planned).  
						29-September-2000 
						 
Note: The 
	contents in these pages are provided without any guarantee, 
	written or implied. Readers are free to use them at their 
	own risk, for personal use only. No commercial use is allowed 
	without prior written consent from the author.  
					 | 
				 
			 
		 | 
				
		
		  |